Why Defining Words by Cross-Reference Should Cease
Why Defining Words by Cross-Reference Should Cease By Chris Micheli When adding a new law to California statutes, there are basically two ways of defining a word or phrase in that new statute. The first is to define the word or term in the new statute. The second is to cross-reference an existing definition that is contained in another section of law. With a cross-reference, the definition of the word or phrase could come from the same Code in which you are adding a new section, or it could come from a different Code (recall there are 29 Codes that contain 156,000 statutes in California law). Why do I think it is not a good idea to cross-reference a definition? First, and most importantly, it requires the reader to go find that other section of law to see the definition that is applicable. It is much easier for the reader to see the definiti...