Chris Micheli

Legal Standing of Associations to Sue  By Chris Micheli What is “legal standing”? Sometimes known by the Latin term, locus standi , it is the right of a person or entity to file a lawsuit or participate in a legal proceeding in state or federal court. It is essentially a legal threshold that must be met before a court can consider the merits of the lawsuit that has been filed.             As a general rule, in the federal court system, there is a requirement that a “case or controversy” exist. On the other hand, in California, no such requirement exists because the California Constitution does not contain a “case or controversy” requirement and the courts do not consider public interest standing to violate the California Constitution’s separation of powers doctrine in Article III, Section 3. Nonetheless, similar to the federal “case or controversy” requirement, California’s standing requirement serves “to ensure that the ...

Introduction to Regulatory Drafting  By Chris Micheli             What is regulatory drafting? Regulatory drafting or regulations drafting is the work done by state executive branch officials in agencies, departments, boards, commissions, and bureaus that have rulemaking authority under the California Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Of course, regulations can also be drafted by attorneys, lobbyists, interest groups, and others who want to propose the addition, amendment, or repeal of regulations in the California Code of Regulations (CCR).             As opposed to legislative drafting of bills, resolutions, and constitutional amendments to be considered by the Legislature, regulatory drafting concerns the lawmaking that is done by the executive branch of government in California. There are more than 200 state entities that have authority to adopt regulations. ...

Courts Removing Statewide Measures from the Ballot  By Chris Micheli Have courts removed measures from the statewide ballot in California? The answer is yes. In fact, the judicial branch has done so recently in three instances. The most recent example was in 2024, when the qualified measure for the statewide ballot, called the California Two-Thirds Legislative Vote and Voter Approval for New or Increased Taxes Initiative, was removed by the California Supreme Court, which ruled that the proposed measure amounted to an impermissible revision of the state Constitution and therefore could not go before the voters. This measure was prevented from being placed on the ballot despite having obtained the requisite number of voter signatures to qualify. In 2018, the California Supreme Court removed a measure from the statewide ballot. It was Prop. 9, called the Three States Initiative. It was removed because the court determined that “the potential harm in permitting the measure to re...

Specific Guidance for Drafting Regulations  By Chris Micheli The following are some specific drafting principles I have found in the drafting manuals of other states, which appear to apply in California based upon my review of regulations over the years: ·        If a department is defined, then all subsequent references in the regulations should be to "the department." The department's full name need not be written out, except when confusion would result from references to other departments. ·        Use lower case for titles of public officials. ·        Capitalize short titles of acts. ·        Express numbers in the text with words followed by numerals in parentheses. ·        Hyphenate numbers from twenty-one to ninety-nine. ·        Write dates in the form of "month" then "day." When a...

Instructing the Courts on Interpretation  By Chris Micheli             In reviewing some recent legislation in the 2026 California Legislative Session, I have come across several bills that contain “liberally construe” language, as well as one that used “liberally interpret” language. In other words, this language is directed at state agencies and the judicial branch that the statute in review should be liberally construed or liberally interpreted.             This raised the question with me: Which is the better language to use? First, I wanted to research the use of these phrases in state statutes. I found that there are thousands of California statutes that use the standard language “liberally construed.” However, there are also many state statutes that use the less common “liberally interpreted.” How many of each appear in state law? ·     ...

Guidance for Drafting Regulations in the Active Voice B y Chris Micheli             In California, drafters of regulations and bills are instructed to use the active voice, rather than the passive voice. This is a change in the historical manner of drafting that previously included lots of passive voice language in state laws.             As a result, many examples of the passive voice remain in California regulations and statutes. The following examples of passive versus active voice changes to state statutes are contained in bills recently enacted into law in this state:   …provide comments to the department on all proposed projects funded from the Big Game Management Account to help ensure that the requirements of this section  have been  are  met.                   Nothing in this chapter shal...