What Is the Difference Between Senate Rules 28.8 and 28.9?

What Is the Difference Between Senate Rules 28.8 and 28.9? By Chris Micheli

            Two separate California State Senate Rules grant power to the Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee to dispense with hearing a fiscal-related bill and instead send that bill directly to the Floor of the State Senate. That power is set forth in Senate Rules 28.8 and 28.9. Senate Rule (SR) 28.8 deals with bills that have nominal state costs, while SR 28.9 deals with bills that have nominal local costs.

            Senate Rule 28.8 provides that a bill that has been “keyed fiscal” by the Office of Legislative Counsel, and that does not appropriate money, may not be set for hearing and must be promptly reported to the Senate Floor with the recommendation that the bill be placed on the Second Reading File, so long as the Appropriations Committee Chair determines that “(a) any additional state costs are not significant and do not and will not require the appropriation of additional state funds, and (b) the bill will cause no significant reduction in revenues.”

            Senate Rule 28.9 provides that a bill that has been “keyed local program” by the Office of Legislative Counsel must be rereferred to the Committee on Appropriations, and the bill may not be rereferred to the Committee on Governance and Finance. In addition, if that bill does not appropriate money and does not contain a complete disclaimer, then the bill need not be set for hearing and may, along with any nonsubstantive amendments, be reported to the Senate with the recommendation that the bill be placed on the Second Reading File, so long as the Appropriations Committee Chair determines that “(1) any additional local costs are not significant and (2) the bill will cause no significant reduction in local revenues.”

            The end result of these two Senate Rules is that the Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee has to waive a hearing for bills that have insignificant state costs and may waive a hearing for bills that have insignificant local costs.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?  By Chris Micheli             As I did my final review of Governor Newsom’s actions on the 1,046 bills sent to him after the 2023 Legislative Session, I noticed that some of the Governor’s veto messages provide additional rationales for limiting bill introductions.             Out of 156 vetoes from the 2023 Session, the number one reason for the Governor’s veto was budget concerns or cost pressures. In fact, 41% of the vetoes used that basis. That by itself is not a reason to limit bill introductions, but another statistic may provide such a reason…             By my count, just over 1/3 of the bills vetoed by Governor Newsom likely should not have been sent to his Desk and, arguably, should not have made it through the process at all. In fact, perhaps they should not h...
Read more

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process  By Chris Micheli             What are the main parts of the California state budget? They are the Budget Bill, Budget Bill Junior, Trailer Bills, and Supplemental Reports.             What is the Budget Bill? This bill contains the appropriations and “Budget Bill Language”. Note that only a Budget Bill (or BBJ) can contain multiple appropriations. It requires a majority vote for passage and the bill takes effect immediately. There is just one Budget Bill. What is the “Budget Bill Jr.”? This is the bill that amends the main Budget Bill by making changes to multiple appropriations. There are often multiple BBJs. What is a Trailer Bill? This bill makes the statutory changes needed to implement the budget. It is the same as any other bill, but it takes effect immediately with a majority vote if it contain...
Read more

Can Any Bill Call an Election?

Can Any Bill Call an Election?  By Chris Micheli             In June 2024, we saw two bills that contain a provision to call an election.             Both bills contain a “plus” section at the end of the bill, which is an uncodified statute, stating the following: “this act calls an election within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect.” Such a measure only requires a majority vote, unless some other constitutional provision requires a higher vote threshold (e.g., a tax increase). What is the basis for this statement? Section 8(c)(3) of Article IV of the state Constitution provides: “ Statutes calling elections, statutes providing for tax levies or appropriations for the usual current expenses of the State, and urgency statutes shall go into effect immediately upon their enactment.” However, there is no further gui...
Read more