Senators Temporarily Cover “Unrepresented” Areas of California

Senators Temporarily Cover “Unrepresented” Areas of California By Chris Micheli

As a result of the interaction of different provisions of law, and the odd-numbered and even-numbered Senate districts, there are instances each ten years for a geographic area of the state to either not have an elected senator representing some areas of the state, or other instances where an area is represented by a second senator. This anomaly is corrected in the following election cycle (e.g., in 2024).

 

In order to address this anomaly, the Senate Committee on Rules assigns current Senators to “represent” those currently “unrepresented” areas of the state for 2023 and 2024. Once new senators are sworn into office on the first Monday in December 2024 (representing the odd-numbered Senate Districts), this coverage will no longer be necessary.

 

On January 18, 2023, the Senate Rules Committee adopted what it calls the “Deferred Area Assignments.” The Senate’s Deferred Area Assignments are based upon the 2021 Certified Redistricting Maps. They are called “deferred areas” because these areas of the state do not have district until after the 2024 General Election.

 

According to Senate President pro tempore Toni Atkins, about 3.6 million Californians are “unrepresented” with the new Senate District maps. The Rules Committee’s action this week assigned a Senator to these deferred areas in order to provide constituent services.

 

As Senator Atkins explained at the hearing, these Deferred Area Assignments were made to ensure that all Californians have a voice in the State Senate and can obtain assistance from elected representatives. As a result, current senators are to provide constituent services to these citizens in the “unrepresented” areas. Again, the issue goes aways the first Monday in December 2024. In the meantime, all citizens are ensured access to government services.

 

By the way, the Senate has a term for those areas of the state where an existing odd-numbered district is covering an area(s) with a new even-numbered district – these are called “Accelerated Areas” in which constituents in these areas have two current Senators who represent them.

 

As a result of the Rules Committee’s action, during the next 22 months or so, the following state senators are “representing” additional areas of the state:

 

SENATOR

ADDITIONAL CONSTITUENTS REPRESENTED

Ben Allen (D)

85,000

Bob Archuleta (D)

52,000

Toni Atkins (D)

265,000

Catherine Blakespear (D)

120,000

Steve Bradford (D)

75,000

Anna Caballero (D)

300,000

Brian Dahle (R)

330,000

Bill Dodd (D)

54,000

Maria Elena Durazo (D)

96,000

Lena Gonzalez (D)

65,000

Shannon Grove (R)

145,000

Brian Jones (R)

125,000

Mike McGuire (D)

17,000

Caroline Menjivar (D)

276,000

Roger Niello (R)

182,000

Rosilicie Ochoa-Bogh (R)

223,000

Steve Padilla (D)

233,000

Anthony Portantino (D)

128.000

Richard Roth (D)

287,000

Susan Rubio (D)

176,000

Kelly Seyarto (R)

188,000

Nancy Skinner (D)

144,000

Tom Umberg (D)

64,000

Aisha Wahab (D)

28,000

Scott Wilk (R)

19,000

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?  By Chris Micheli             As I did my final review of Governor Newsom’s actions on the 1,046 bills sent to him after the 2023 Legislative Session, I noticed that some of the Governor’s veto messages provide additional rationales for limiting bill introductions.             Out of 156 vetoes from the 2023 Session, the number one reason for the Governor’s veto was budget concerns or cost pressures. In fact, 41% of the vetoes used that basis. That by itself is not a reason to limit bill introductions, but another statistic may provide such a reason…             By my count, just over 1/3 of the bills vetoed by Governor Newsom likely should not have been sent to his Desk and, arguably, should not have made it through the process at all. In fact, perhaps they should not have been introduced at all? The bases for just over 1/3 of the vetoes by the Governor included these categories: ·          18% were deemed unnecessary ·         
Read more

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process  By Chris Micheli             What are the main parts of the California state budget? They are the Budget Bill, Budget Bill Junior, Trailer Bills, and Supplemental Reports.             What is the Budget Bill? This bill contains the appropriations and “Budget Bill Language”. Note that only a Budget Bill (or BBJ) can contain multiple appropriations. It requires a majority vote for passage and the bill takes effect immediately. There is just one Budget Bill. What is the “Budget Bill Jr.”? This is the bill that amends the main Budget Bill by making changes to multiple appropriations. There are often multiple BBJs. What is a Trailer Bill? This bill makes the statutory changes needed to implement the budget. It is the same as any other bill, but it takes effect immediately with a majority vote if it contains an appropriation related to the budget bill and is listed as a “trailer bill” in the Budget Bill. What is a Su
Read more

Can Any Bill Call an Election?

Can Any Bill Call an Election?  By Chris Micheli             In June 2024, we saw two bills that contain a provision to call an election.             Both bills contain a “plus” section at the end of the bill, which is an uncodified statute, stating the following: “this act calls an election within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect.” Such a measure only requires a majority vote, unless some other constitutional provision requires a higher vote threshold (e.g., a tax increase). What is the basis for this statement? Section 8(c)(3) of Article IV of the state Constitution provides: “ Statutes calling elections, statutes providing for tax levies or appropriations for the usual current expenses of the State, and urgency statutes shall go into effect immediately upon their enactment.” However, there is no further guidance in the Constitution, nor in any California Code, regarding what a “statute calling an election” looks like o
Read more