Possible New Approach for Appropriations Bills?

Possible New Approach for Appropriations Bills? By Chris Micheli

            In reviewing the hundreds of new bill introductions for the 2023 California Legislative Session, I came across a possible new approach for appropriations bills. Will this approach take hold with other measures as well?

            The language is found in a “plus section” at the end of the particular bill and contains the following intent language (this language would be uncodified):

 

(a) It is the intent of the Legislature that this section be considered for the purpose of any appropriation made to implement Section 123833 of the Health and Safety Code, as added by the act that added this section.

(b) If the Director of Finance certifies that the state General Fund would be in a deficit in the following fiscal year, the Governor may, on or before July 1 of that fiscal year, notify the Legislature of the Governor’s recommendation that an appropriation not be made for any sustainability and access payments, inflation-based increases to payment rates for physician services, or reimbursements for lifesaving specialty drugs, as related to the California Children’s Services (CCS) Program, as described in Section 123833 of the Health and Safety Code, for the following fiscal year. It is the intent of the Legislature that any temporary suspension of those payments, rate increases, or reimbursements not exceed two consecutive fiscal years.

            Subdivision (a) sets forth legislative intent that this section of the bill is to be taken into account for any subsequent appropriation of funds to implement the new statute that would be created by this bill.

            Subdivision (b) would authorize the Governor to recommend that an appropriation not be made to fund specified items otherwise required by the new statute that would be created by this bill. In addition, this subdivision sets forth legislative intent that any suspension of appropriations not last for more than two years.

            In light of the estimated state budget deficit, we may see more of this type of language in other bills considered this year by the California Legislature.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?  By Chris Micheli             As I did my final review of Governor Newsom’s actions on the 1,046 bills sent to him after the 2023 Legislative Session, I noticed that some of the Governor’s veto messages provide additional rationales for limiting bill introductions.             Out of 156 vetoes from the 2023 Session, the number one reason for the Governor’s veto was budget concerns or cost pressures. In fact, 41% of the vetoes used that basis. That by itself is not a reason to limit bill introductions, but another statistic may provide such a reason…             By my count, just over 1/3 of the bills vetoed by Governor Newsom likely should not have been sent to his Desk and, arguably, should not have made it through the process at all. In fact, perhaps they should not h...
Read more

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process  By Chris Micheli             What are the main parts of the California state budget? They are the Budget Bill, Budget Bill Junior, Trailer Bills, and Supplemental Reports.             What is the Budget Bill? This bill contains the appropriations and “Budget Bill Language”. Note that only a Budget Bill (or BBJ) can contain multiple appropriations. It requires a majority vote for passage and the bill takes effect immediately. There is just one Budget Bill. What is the “Budget Bill Jr.”? This is the bill that amends the main Budget Bill by making changes to multiple appropriations. There are often multiple BBJs. What is a Trailer Bill? This bill makes the statutory changes needed to implement the budget. It is the same as any other bill, but it takes effect immediately with a majority vote if it contain...
Read more

Can Any Bill Call an Election?

Can Any Bill Call an Election?  By Chris Micheli             In June 2024, we saw two bills that contain a provision to call an election.             Both bills contain a “plus” section at the end of the bill, which is an uncodified statute, stating the following: “this act calls an election within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect.” Such a measure only requires a majority vote, unless some other constitutional provision requires a higher vote threshold (e.g., a tax increase). What is the basis for this statement? Section 8(c)(3) of Article IV of the state Constitution provides: “ Statutes calling elections, statutes providing for tax levies or appropriations for the usual current expenses of the State, and urgency statutes shall go into effect immediately upon their enactment.” However, there is no further gui...
Read more