Can the Governor Skip the State-of-the-State Address?

Can the Governor Skip the State-of-the-State Address? By Chris Micheli

            Governor Newsom announced that he would not be delivering the traditional State-of-the-State address in the Assembly Chambers in the historic California State Capitol in 2023. Can he do that? The answer is yes.

             Article 5, Section 3 of the California Constitution states: “The Governor shall report to the Legislature each calendar year on the condition of the State and may make recommendations.” This language is clear that an annual report must be made to the Legislature, but form that report takes is not specified. In other words, the state Constitution does not specify whether a written or verbal report is done.

 

            Of course, to use legislative terminology, it has been the “custom and practice” of California Governors to address the two houses of the Legislature in the Assembly Chambers for many decades. This has occurred since roughly the time of World War II when Governors began supplementing their written report with their speech to the Legislature.

 

            Governor Newsom plans to comply with Article V, Section 3 by providing a written report. In the second clause of Section 3, it is permissive whether the Governor has to make recommendations. In almost all instances, that has been done and Governor Newsom has said he will do so as well when he goes on a statewide tour.

 

            While Governor Newsom made the traditional SOTS speeches his first two years in office, during the pandemic, he gave his third speech inside Dodgers Stadium in Los Angeles, and his fourth speech was made from a state agency’s auditorium.

 

            By the way, it is interesting to note that Article IV, Section 22 of the state Constitution has a reporting requirement by the four legislative leaders. At the convening of the 2-year session and at the close of each regular session, the four legislative leaders must set forth their goals and objectives for the session and the progress they made towards meeting them.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?  By Chris Micheli             As I did my final review of Governor Newsom’s actions on the 1,046 bills sent to him after the 2023 Legislative Session, I noticed that some of the Governor’s veto messages provide additional rationales for limiting bill introductions.             Out of 156 vetoes from the 2023 Session, the number one reason for the Governor’s veto was budget concerns or cost pressures. In fact, 41% of the vetoes used that basis. That by itself is not a reason to limit bill introductions, but another statistic may provide such a reason…             By my count, just over 1/3 of the bills vetoed by Governor Newsom likely should not have been sent to his Desk and, arguably, should not have made it through the process at all. In fact, perhaps they should not h...
Read more

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process  By Chris Micheli             What are the main parts of the California state budget? They are the Budget Bill, Budget Bill Junior, Trailer Bills, and Supplemental Reports.             What is the Budget Bill? This bill contains the appropriations and “Budget Bill Language”. Note that only a Budget Bill (or BBJ) can contain multiple appropriations. It requires a majority vote for passage and the bill takes effect immediately. There is just one Budget Bill. What is the “Budget Bill Jr.”? This is the bill that amends the main Budget Bill by making changes to multiple appropriations. There are often multiple BBJs. What is a Trailer Bill? This bill makes the statutory changes needed to implement the budget. It is the same as any other bill, but it takes effect immediately with a majority vote if it contain...
Read more

Can Any Bill Call an Election?

Can Any Bill Call an Election?  By Chris Micheli             In June 2024, we saw two bills that contain a provision to call an election.             Both bills contain a “plus” section at the end of the bill, which is an uncodified statute, stating the following: “this act calls an election within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect.” Such a measure only requires a majority vote, unless some other constitutional provision requires a higher vote threshold (e.g., a tax increase). What is the basis for this statement? Section 8(c)(3) of Article IV of the state Constitution provides: “ Statutes calling elections, statutes providing for tax levies or appropriations for the usual current expenses of the State, and urgency statutes shall go into effect immediately upon their enactment.” However, there is no further gui...
Read more