What Are Rulemaking Appeals to the Governor's Office?

What Are Rulemaking Appeals to the Governor's Office? By Chris Micheli

            When and why does a regulatory agency appeal certain decisions to the Governor’s Office? While the last time occurred in 2007, a state agency can appeal the rejection of a regulation by the Office of Administrative Law (OAL).

OAL must either approve a regulation submitted to it for review and transmit it to the Secretary of State for filing, or disapprove it, within 30 working days after the regulation has been submitted to OAL. If OAL disapproves a regulation, then OAL must return it to the adopting agency within the 30-day period accompanied by a notice specifying the reasons for disapproval.

A regulation cannot be disapproved by OAL unless the regulation failed to comply with one or more of the six statutory standards of review, or other provisions of the APA.

OAL’s decision can be reviewed. First, the adopting agency must file a written Request for Review with the Governor’s Legal Affairs Secretary within 10 days of receipt of the written opinion provided by the OAL. The Request for Review must include a complete statement, along with other specified materials, as to why the adopting agency believes the decision by OAL is incorrect and should be overruled.

Second, OAL then files its written response with the Governor’s Office. Specifically, OAL must file its written response to the adopting agency’s request with the Governor’s Legal Affairs Secretary within 10 days and deliver a copy of its response to the agency on the same day it is delivered to the Governor’s office.

Thereafter, the Governor’s Office must provide the requesting agency and OAL with a written decision within 15 days of receipt of the response by OAL to the agency’s Request for Review.

Finally, if the Governor overrules OAL’s decision to reject a rulemaking, then OAL must immediately transmit the adopted regulation to the Secretary of State for filing. Thereafter, the Governor must immediately transmit to the Committees on Rules of both houses of the Legislature a statement of his or her reasons for overruling the decision of OAL.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?  By Chris Micheli             As I did my final review of Governor Newsom’s actions on the 1,046 bills sent to him after the 2023 Legislative Session, I noticed that some of the Governor’s veto messages provide additional rationales for limiting bill introductions.             Out of 156 vetoes from the 2023 Session, the number one reason for the Governor’s veto was budget concerns or cost pressures. In fact, 41% of the vetoes used that basis. That by itself is not a reason to limit bill introductions, but another statistic may provide such a reason…             By my count, just over 1/3 of the bills vetoed by Governor Newsom likely should not have been sent to his Desk and, arguably, should not have made it through the process at all. In fact, perhaps they should not h...
Read more

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process  By Chris Micheli             What are the main parts of the California state budget? They are the Budget Bill, Budget Bill Junior, Trailer Bills, and Supplemental Reports.             What is the Budget Bill? This bill contains the appropriations and “Budget Bill Language”. Note that only a Budget Bill (or BBJ) can contain multiple appropriations. It requires a majority vote for passage and the bill takes effect immediately. There is just one Budget Bill. What is the “Budget Bill Jr.”? This is the bill that amends the main Budget Bill by making changes to multiple appropriations. There are often multiple BBJs. What is a Trailer Bill? This bill makes the statutory changes needed to implement the budget. It is the same as any other bill, but it takes effect immediately with a majority vote if it contain...
Read more

Can Any Bill Call an Election?

Can Any Bill Call an Election?  By Chris Micheli             In June 2024, we saw two bills that contain a provision to call an election.             Both bills contain a “plus” section at the end of the bill, which is an uncodified statute, stating the following: “this act calls an election within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect.” Such a measure only requires a majority vote, unless some other constitutional provision requires a higher vote threshold (e.g., a tax increase). What is the basis for this statement? Section 8(c)(3) of Article IV of the state Constitution provides: “ Statutes calling elections, statutes providing for tax levies or appropriations for the usual current expenses of the State, and urgency statutes shall go into effect immediately upon their enactment.” However, there is no further gui...
Read more