Frequently Asked Questions about OAL’s Disapproval Process for Regulations

Frequently Asked Questions about OAL’s Disapproval Process for Regulations By Chris Micheli

            Is OAL required to review regulations? Yes, the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) is charged with reviewing all proposed regulations by California’s executive branch administrative agencies and departments.

Where is this requirement on OAL found in the law? This review process is set forth in Government Code Sections 11349 to 11349.6.

What is OAL required to do? OAL is required to either approve a regulation or disapprove it, which must occur within 30 working days after the regulation has been submitted to the OAL for review.

            What happens if OAL approves the regulation? If the proposed regulation is approved, then OAL transmits the approved regulation to the Secretary of State for filing.

What happens if OAL does not act within 30 days? If OAL fails to act within the 30-day working period, then the proposed regulation is deemed to have been approved and the OAL is required to transit the regulation to the Secretary of State for filing.

            What happens if OAL disapproves the regulation? If OAL disapproves a regulation, then OAL returns the regulation to the adopting state agency within the 30-day review period along with a notice that must specify the reasons for disapproval. Within 7 calendar days of issuing that notice, OAL must provide the adopting agency with a written decision detailing its reasons for disapproval.

            What is the basis for OAL disapproving a regulation? A regulation cannot be disapproved except for failure to comply with one of the six statutory standards of review that are set forth in Government Code Section 11349.1. Those six standards include authority, reference, nonduplication, clarity, necessity, and consistency.

            What happens after OAL disapproves a regulation? The disapproval process allows the state agency 120 days to fix the disapproved portion and then to re-submit for further consideration by OAL. Thereafter, OAL has 30 working days to review the re-submitted documents.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?  By Chris Micheli             As I did my final review of Governor Newsom’s actions on the 1,046 bills sent to him after the 2023 Legislative Session, I noticed that some of the Governor’s veto messages provide additional rationales for limiting bill introductions.             Out of 156 vetoes from the 2023 Session, the number one reason for the Governor’s veto was budget concerns or cost pressures. In fact, 41% of the vetoes used that basis. That by itself is not a reason to limit bill introductions, but another statistic may provide such a reason…             By my count, just over 1/3 of the bills vetoed by Governor Newsom likely should not have been sent to his Desk and, arguably, should not have made it through the process at all. In fact, perhaps they should not h...
Read more

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process  By Chris Micheli             What are the main parts of the California state budget? They are the Budget Bill, Budget Bill Junior, Trailer Bills, and Supplemental Reports.             What is the Budget Bill? This bill contains the appropriations and “Budget Bill Language”. Note that only a Budget Bill (or BBJ) can contain multiple appropriations. It requires a majority vote for passage and the bill takes effect immediately. There is just one Budget Bill. What is the “Budget Bill Jr.”? This is the bill that amends the main Budget Bill by making changes to multiple appropriations. There are often multiple BBJs. What is a Trailer Bill? This bill makes the statutory changes needed to implement the budget. It is the same as any other bill, but it takes effect immediately with a majority vote if it contain...
Read more

Can Any Bill Call an Election?

Can Any Bill Call an Election?  By Chris Micheli             In June 2024, we saw two bills that contain a provision to call an election.             Both bills contain a “plus” section at the end of the bill, which is an uncodified statute, stating the following: “this act calls an election within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect.” Such a measure only requires a majority vote, unless some other constitutional provision requires a higher vote threshold (e.g., a tax increase). What is the basis for this statement? Section 8(c)(3) of Article IV of the state Constitution provides: “ Statutes calling elections, statutes providing for tax levies or appropriations for the usual current expenses of the State, and urgency statutes shall go into effect immediately upon their enactment.” However, there is no further gui...
Read more