Yearly Review of Bills Passed by House of Origin and Other House

Yearly Review of Bills Passed by House of Origin and Other House By Chris Micheli

            In reviewing bill actions over the past seventeen years in the California Legislature, I have put together the following chart, on an annual basis per Session year. The purpose of this chart is to examine (1) how many bills annually pass their house of origin and (2) how many of those bills pass the second house. In other words, how does the second house generally treat those bills passed over from their house of origin. As a result, the chart below contains the following four categories:

 

·         After the Session year, the first column is the number of Senate Bills (SBs) that passed their house of origin by the deadline, and the percentage of passed bills versus the number of introduced SBs.

·         The second column is the number of SBs that passed the other house (i.e., the Assembly), and the percentage of Assembly-passed SBs versus those passed by the Senate.

·         The third column is the number of Assembly Bills (ABs) that passed their house of origin by the deadline, and the percentage of passed bills versus the number of introduced ABs.

·         The fourth column is the number of ABs that passed the other house (i.e., the Senate), and the percentage of Senate-passed ABs versus those that passed the Assembly.

 

YEAR

# of SBs Passed Senate Floor

# of SBs Passed Assembly Floor

# of ABs Passed Assembly Floor

# of ABs Passed Senate Floor

2024

499 (78%)

TBD

933 (61%)

TBD

2023

659 (74%)

381 (58%)

1,056 (60%)

665 (63%)

2022

605 (90%)

442 (73%)

849 (61%)

724 (85%)

2021

551 (67%)

313 (57%)

793 (50%)

523 (66%)

2020

246 (36%)

137 (56%)

430 (28%)

291 (68%)

2019

562 (71%)

346 (61%)

1,040 (57%)

696 (67%)

2018

518 (75%)

408 (79%)

942 (61%)

809 (86%)

2017

514 (63%)

325 (63%)

970 (56%)

652 (67%)

2016

430 (64%)

367 (85%)

846 (62%)

684 (81%)

2015

480 (60%)

319 (66%)

906 (58%)

621 (68%)

2014

463 (72%)

372 (80%)

852 (64%)

703 (82%)

2013

499 (60%)

354 (71%)

766 (53%)

542 (71%)

2012

472 (75%)

356 (75%)

743 (59%)

640 (86%)

2011

511 (54%)

357 (70%)

767 (53%)

513 (67%)

2010

473 (71%)

358 (76%)

759 (63%)

671 (88%)

2009

460 (55%)

308 (67%)

904 (57%)

585 (65%)

2008

562 (77%)

427 (76%)

879 (66%)

752 (85%)

2007

584 (55%)

380 (65%)

918 (52%)

584 (64%)

AVERAGE

62%

65%

57%

74%

             Based upon the data from the last 17/18 years, the Senate on average passes 62% of all the bills its Senators introduced each year, while the Assembly on average passed 57% of all the bills its Assembly Members introduced each year. In addition, the Assembly passed on average 65% of all Senate bills it considered, while the Senate passed on average 74% of all Assembly bills it considered.  Finally, the Senate on average passed more of its bills out of the house of origin than the Assembly did (62% v. 57%), while the Assembly passed fewer Senate Bills out of its house than the Senate passed Assembly bills out of its house (65 v. 74%). Stated another way, the Senate historically passes more bills out of its house than the Assembly does out of its house, and this applies for both house of origin and second house bills.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?  By Chris Micheli             As I did my final review of Governor Newsom’s actions on the 1,046 bills sent to him after the 2023 Legislative Session, I noticed that some of the Governor’s veto messages provide additional rationales for limiting bill introductions.             Out of 156 vetoes from the 2023 Session, the number one reason for the Governor’s veto was budget concerns or cost pressures. In fact, 41% of the vetoes used that basis. That by itself is not a reason to limit bill introductions, but another statistic may provide such a reason…             By my count, just over 1/3 of the bills vetoed by Governor Newsom likely should not have been sent to his Desk and, arguably, should not have made it through the process at all. In fact, perhaps they should not have been introduced at all? The bases for just over 1/3 of the vetoes by the Governor included these categories: ·          18% were deemed unnecessary ·         
Read more

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process  By Chris Micheli             What are the main parts of the California state budget? They are the Budget Bill, Budget Bill Junior, Trailer Bills, and Supplemental Reports.             What is the Budget Bill? This bill contains the appropriations and “Budget Bill Language”. Note that only a Budget Bill (or BBJ) can contain multiple appropriations. It requires a majority vote for passage and the bill takes effect immediately. There is just one Budget Bill. What is the “Budget Bill Jr.”? This is the bill that amends the main Budget Bill by making changes to multiple appropriations. There are often multiple BBJs. What is a Trailer Bill? This bill makes the statutory changes needed to implement the budget. It is the same as any other bill, but it takes effect immediately with a majority vote if it contains an appropriation related to the budget bill and is listed as a “trailer bill” in the Budget Bill. What is a Su
Read more

Can Any Bill Call an Election?

Can Any Bill Call an Election?  By Chris Micheli             In June 2024, we saw two bills that contain a provision to call an election.             Both bills contain a “plus” section at the end of the bill, which is an uncodified statute, stating the following: “this act calls an election within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect.” Such a measure only requires a majority vote, unless some other constitutional provision requires a higher vote threshold (e.g., a tax increase). What is the basis for this statement? Section 8(c)(3) of Article IV of the state Constitution provides: “ Statutes calling elections, statutes providing for tax levies or appropriations for the usual current expenses of the State, and urgency statutes shall go into effect immediately upon their enactment.” However, there is no further guidance in the Constitution, nor in any California Code, regarding what a “statute calling an election” looks like o
Read more