CA Regulatory Explainer: Economic Impact Analysis for Proposed Regulations

CA Regulatory Explainer: Economic Impact Analysis for Proposed Regulations By Chris Micheli

            As part of California’s Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which is found in the Government Code, executive branch agencies that promulgate regulations are required to conduct an economic impact analysis. What is that analysis and how have the courts interpreted agency actions to comply with this statutory mandate?

            Under existing law, all regulations are required to have an analysis of the potential economic impact of a regulation. Specifically, pursuant to Government Code Section 11346.3, a state entity proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal any regulation must assess the potential for adverse economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals.

These rulemaking entities must also avoid the imposition of unnecessary or unreasonable regulations or reporting, recordkeeping, or compliance requirements. This short analysis is done by completing the Economic Impact Statement, which is a 5-page, fill-in-the-blanks form, which is probably sufficient for most regulations.

            The state entity, prior to submitting its proposed regulatory action to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) to begin the formal rulemaking process (i.e., part of the “initial statement of reasons”), must consider the proposal’s impact on business, with consideration of industries affected including the ability of California businesses to compete with businesses in other states. The state entity must even consider information supplied by interested parties.

            What does this economic assessment include? The state entity must assess whether and to what extent it will affect the following:

·         The creation or elimination of jobs within the state.

·         The creation of new businesses or the elimination of existing businesses within the state.

·         The expansion of businesses currently doing business within the state.

·         The benefits of the regulation to the health and welfare of California residents, worker safety, and the state’s environment.

            Under the APA, an economic impact assessment of a proposed regulation has three phases: first, the agency makes an initial, provisional determination of whether the proposed rule will have a significant adverse economic impact on businesses; second, during the public comment period, affected parties may comment on the agency’s initial determination and supply additional information relevant to the issue; and, third, when the agency issues its final decision and statement of reasons, it must respond to the public comments and either change its proposal in response to the comments or explain why it has not. Western States Petroleum Association v. Board of Equalization (2013) 57 Cal. 4th 401

            Under the economic impact assessment requirement of the APA, a rulemaking agency making an initial disclosure must include facts, evidence, documents, or testimony relief on to support an initial determination that the action will not have a significant adverse economic impact on business. John R. Lawson Rock & Oil Inc. v. State Air Resources Board (2018) 20 Cal.App. 5th 77

            The APA broadly requires consideration of significant, statewide adverse economic impacts directly affecting business and the APA likewise requires an analysis of several factors that are broadly drafted in a manner which does not suggest solely inter-state impacts. An agency is not permitted under the statutory scheme to ignore evidence of impacts to specific segments of businesses already doing business in California from benefits to other in-state businesses when proceeding under the APA.

In addition, if the agency’s proposed regulatory amendments placed the state’s thumb on the scale for one group of in-state businesses over another, it needed to consider that impact. Moreover, in failing to properly respond to the comments regarding intra-state competition issues, the agency failed to abide by its obligations under the APA in either form or substance. John R. Lawson Rock & Oil Inc. v. State Air Resources Board (2018) 20 Cal.App. 5th 77

The agency’s determination does not need to be conclusive, and the agency need not assess or declare all adverse economic impact anticipated. An agency’s initial determination of the economic impact of a regulation under the APA calls for an evaluation based on facts. Mere speculative belief is not sufficient to support an agency declaration of its initial determination about the economic impact of a regulation under the APA, and the agency must provide in the record any “facts, evidence, documents, testimony, or other evidence” upon which it relies for its initial determination. California Association of Medical Products Suppliers v. Maxwell-Jolly (2011) 199 Cal.App. 4th 286

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?

Another Reason to Limit Bill Introductions?  By Chris Micheli             As I did my final review of Governor Newsom’s actions on the 1,046 bills sent to him after the 2023 Legislative Session, I noticed that some of the Governor’s veto messages provide additional rationales for limiting bill introductions.             Out of 156 vetoes from the 2023 Session, the number one reason for the Governor’s veto was budget concerns or cost pressures. In fact, 41% of the vetoes used that basis. That by itself is not a reason to limit bill introductions, but another statistic may provide such a reason…             By my count, just over 1/3 of the bills vetoed by Governor Newsom likely should not have been sent to his Desk and, arguably, should not have made it through the process at all. In fact, perhaps they should not h...
Read more

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process

Frequently Asked Questions about California’s Budget Process  By Chris Micheli             What are the main parts of the California state budget? They are the Budget Bill, Budget Bill Junior, Trailer Bills, and Supplemental Reports.             What is the Budget Bill? This bill contains the appropriations and “Budget Bill Language”. Note that only a Budget Bill (or BBJ) can contain multiple appropriations. It requires a majority vote for passage and the bill takes effect immediately. There is just one Budget Bill. What is the “Budget Bill Jr.”? This is the bill that amends the main Budget Bill by making changes to multiple appropriations. There are often multiple BBJs. What is a Trailer Bill? This bill makes the statutory changes needed to implement the budget. It is the same as any other bill, but it takes effect immediately with a majority vote if it contain...
Read more

Can Any Bill Call an Election?

Can Any Bill Call an Election?  By Chris Micheli             In June 2024, we saw two bills that contain a provision to call an election.             Both bills contain a “plus” section at the end of the bill, which is an uncodified statute, stating the following: “this act calls an election within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect.” Such a measure only requires a majority vote, unless some other constitutional provision requires a higher vote threshold (e.g., a tax increase). What is the basis for this statement? Section 8(c)(3) of Article IV of the state Constitution provides: “ Statutes calling elections, statutes providing for tax levies or appropriations for the usual current expenses of the State, and urgency statutes shall go into effect immediately upon their enactment.” However, there is no further gui...
Read more