Some Recent Trends in California Legislative Drafting
Some Recent Trends in California Legislative Drafting By Chris Micheli
In reviewing thousands of bills making their way through the legislative process each year, and co-teaching a course on Legislative Drafting at UC Davis King Hall School of Law for the past five years, I have noted a number of recent trends in California bills.
In particular, three common recent trends in bills in the California Legislature include:
- Including
legislative findings and declarations, often followed by statements of
legislative intent.
- Including a
severability clause in bills.
- Making a bill contingent upon a future budget appropriation.
More Legislative Findings and Declarations
More and more bills over the last few Sessions have included legislative findings and declarations, as well as statements of legislative intent. Previously, bills often put findings and declarations in one bill section, and intent statements in a second bill section. The more common approach is to have the findings and declarations, as well as the intent statements, in the bill section. There are about 280 bills containing these clauses in the 2025 Session.
The following is an example of findings and declarations, followed by an intent statement, from a 2025 Session bill:
(a) The Legislature makes the
following findings and declarations:
(1) In 2023, more than 11,000
Californians died because of fentanyl and other overdose deaths. California’s
overdose death toll increased by 4 percent in 2023, while the number of deaths
nationally declined for the first time in five years.
(2) Excessive alcohol use
resulted in an additional death toll of almost 20,000.
(3) Drug-related overdose
deaths were the sixth leading acute cause of death with an age-adjusted death
rate of 29.4 per 100,000 residents in 2023. The drug-related overdose
age-adjusted death rate was greater than the age-adjusted death rates for chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, kidney diseases, and congestive
heart failure.
(4) New addiction medications
and treatment strategies can dramatically reduce overdose deaths and reduce
heavy drinking. Contingency management treatments strongly reduce stimulant
use.
(5) Almost 30,000,000
Californians are enrolled in health plans regulated by the Department of
Managed Health Care and have coverage that includes treatment for substance use
disorder.
(6) Current measures for
post-emergency department followup care report that only 28.6 percent of
Medi-Cal members who visited an emergency department for an overdose or
substance use disorder diagnosis received followup care after 30 days.
(b) It is the intent of the Legislature that the state establish a goal of reducing alcohol- and drug-related addiction deaths by 50 percent by 2033 and that this goal continue in existence and be used to maintain and continue reductions of overdose death and addiction beyond 2033.
More Severability Clauses
More and more bills over the last few Sessions have included severability clauses, regardless of whether the bill is constitutionally suspect. As a canon of statutory construction in California, statutes are presumed to have sections that can be severed while remaining, valid ones, will continue in existence. As a result, practitioners generally believe that such clauses are unnecessary. Nonetheless, more bills are using them. There are about 125 bills containing these clauses in the 2025 Session.
The standard severability clause language used in California bills is the following:
The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
More Bills Contingent on Future Budget Funding
More and more bills over the last few Sessions have included contingent operative language, meaning that these bills, although enacted and effective (i.e., they are “on the books”), can only be operative if funding is made in a future bill or the state budget. Otherwise, the statute is in law, but is inoperative without funding being appropriated. There are about 180 bills containing these clauses in the 2025 Session.
The standard subsequent appropriation language used in California bills is the following:
This chapter shall become operative only upon an appropriation by the Legislature for its purposes in the annual Budget Act or another statute.
While legislative drafting standards
get updated on occasion (e.g., our transition to gender-neutral drafting), some
new provisions are added, while others become more common. The three areas
discussed above can certainly be found in legislation throughout the years,
their particular use has become more prevalent recently.
Comments
Post a Comment