The Life Cycle of a California Regulation
The Life Cycle of a California Regulation By Chris Micheli
This article is intended to provide a step-by-step instruction detailing how a regulation becomes effective in the California rulemaking process.
Rulemaking Bodies
To begin, California has over 200 State agencies, departments, boards, and commissions (referred to as rulemaking bodies) that make public policy through their authority to adopt regulations. A list of State agencies that have adopted regulations can be found on the website of California’s Office of Administrative Law (OAL), which is found at www.oal.ca.gov.
What a Regulation Can Do
A regulation can be added, amended,
or repealed. Regulations are found in the California
Code of Regulations (CCR), which is organized under various subject matter
titles, of which there are 28 titles. These titles contain the over 60,000
state regulations that are currently in effect.
Pre-Rulemaking
Some rulemaking bodies engage in an
interested parties process, or an informal process (sometime referred to as
“pre-rulemaking”) in which the entity solicits or brings together the regulated
community or interested parties to discuss potential rulemaking activities.
Parties can meet with state agency staff prior to a regulatory project
commencing to provide input before the agency staff begins drafting any
regulatory changes. Many agencies and departments utilize an “interested
parties process” to review draft rulemaking projects prior to commencement of
the formal OAL process.
These pre-rulemaking activities can
be brief or quite lengthy in time. Some meetings are used to simply solicit
feedback; in other instances, they are used to write and negotiate regulatory
language before the formal rulemaking process begins.
Rulemaking Laws
California’s Administrative Procedure Act (APA) contains required
procedures for rule-making and administrative hearings conducted by all of
these agencies and departments. The APA is found at Chapter 3.5, 4 and 5
commencing with Section 11340 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the
Government Code.
In addition, there are regulations governing the APA found at CCR Title 1,
Sections 1 – 120. OAL’s website includes checklists used by OAL to review
regulations, as well as their publications such as California Rulemaking
Law under the Administrative Procedure Act.
Public
Notice
Every rulemaking body is required to annually adopt a “rulemaking calendar”
that is published on their website. These rulemaking bodies establish
interested parties mailing lists for notices of rulemaking activities by that
agency or department.
Development
of Regulatory Package
The rulemaking body develops four required documents during the preliminary
activity stage which are needed to initiate the formal rulemaking process: the
express terms of the proposed regulation (i.e., the proposed text), the initial
statement of reasons, the fiscal impact statement, and the notice of proposed
rulemaking.
Initial
Filing of Rulemaking Package
These four initial documents, called the Initial Statement of Reasons (or
ISOR), are initially filed with OAL and then published by the agency.
Formal
Comment Period
Next begins the 45-day opportunity to submit written, faxed or e-mail
comments on all or any part of a proposed rulemaking when the notice of
proposed rulemaking is published in the California Regulatory Notice Register.
The notice of proposed rulemaking is also mailed to interested parties and is
posted on the rulemaking agency’s website.
Public
Hearing
Under the APA, an agency has an option as to whether it wishes to hold a
public hearing on a proposed rulemaking. However, if an agency does not
schedule a public hearing, and any interested person submits a written request
for one within 15 days prior to the close of the written comment period, then
the agency must hold a public hearing. Because of this requirement, an agency
usually schedules a public hearing at the outset.
Agency
Consideration of Submissions
The APA requires a rulemaking agency to consider all relevant information
presented to it during the comment period before adopting, amending or
repealing the regulation. After the initial public comment period, the agency
will often decide to change its initial proposal either in response to public
comments or on its own.
A rulemaking agency must summarize and respond on the record to timely
filed comments. The summary and response to comments demonstrate that the
agency has considered all relevant material presented to it before adopting,
amending or repealing a regulation. An agency may respond to a comment in one
of two ways.
According to OAL, “the agency must either (1) explain how it has amended
the proposal to accommodate the comment or (2) explain the reasons for making
no change to the proposal. An agency’s summary and response to comments are
included as part of the final statement of reasons.”
Further
Public Notice
Before a rulemaking agency adopts regulatory changes, it must mail a notice
of opportunity to comment on those proposed changes along with a copy of the
text of the proposed changes to each person who has submitted written comments
on the proposal, testified at the public hearing, or asked to receive a notice
of proposed modification. The agency must also post the notice on its website.
Transmission
to OAL
Thereafter, the agency must transmit its rulemaking file – called the Final
Statement of Reasons (or FSOR) – to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) for
review within a year from the date that the notice of proposed rulemaking
action was published in the CRNR. OAL then has 30 working days in which to
review the rulemaking record to determine whether it demonstrates that the
rulemaking agency satisfied the procedural requirements of the APA.
Review by
OAL
OAL reviews the rulemaking file for compliance with the six standards of
review: Authority, Reference, Consistency, Clarity, Nonduplication, and
Necessity. OAL may not substitute its judgment for that of the rulemaking
agency with regard to the substantive content of the regulations.
Actions by
OAL
OAL can approve the regulation, in
which case it is transmitted to the Secretary of State’s Office and takes
effect at the beginning of the following calendar quarter. After transmitting
approved regulations to the Secretary of State, the regulatory changes are
published in the California Code of Regulations.
If not approved (deemed a regulatory
disapproval), OAL issues a written decision detailing why a proposed regulation
failed to meet the legal or procedural standards set forth in the APA.
After OAL
Review
Even after the agency or department has completed the rulemaking process,
there are opportunities to be involved such as with OAL review, appeal to the
Governor’s Office, or even challenging the rulemaking in court.
Comments
Post a Comment